Extra Credit
1. A panhandler pushed the man onto the tracks just because he was trying to calm the panhandler down.
2. He took the photo to use his camera flash to warn the train's operator.
3. I don't think he should have.
4. I think he didn't do the best thing because he should've tried to help the man instead.
5. I disagree with the decision because something so tragic and morbid shouldn't be displayed to thousands of people.
6. I think it depends on the specific photojournalist. Some care more about capturing the image while others prefer to stop bad things from happening.
7. I think it could be ethically acceptable depending on the situation that is going on because sometimes it may be crucial to involve yourself.
8. Honestly, I think it truly depends. I feel like photojournalists should capture good and positive events, but not focus so much on the bad ones.
9. I feel like the 1st response stands out as the most appropriate because how would he have enough time to take pictures but not enough time to save the man?
2. He took the photo to use his camera flash to warn the train's operator.
3. I don't think he should have.
4. I think he didn't do the best thing because he should've tried to help the man instead.
5. I disagree with the decision because something so tragic and morbid shouldn't be displayed to thousands of people.
6. I think it depends on the specific photojournalist. Some care more about capturing the image while others prefer to stop bad things from happening.
7. I think it could be ethically acceptable depending on the situation that is going on because sometimes it may be crucial to involve yourself.
8. Honestly, I think it truly depends. I feel like photojournalists should capture good and positive events, but not focus so much on the bad ones.
9. I feel like the 1st response stands out as the most appropriate because how would he have enough time to take pictures but not enough time to save the man?
Comments
Post a Comment